QUANT LAB
00 XP

Search

23 questions · 1 formulas

Total return

Total return = (P1 − P0)/P0 + Income/P0

Trap: Divide by the BEGINNING value.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Property starts at SEK 100m, ends at SEK 104m, and generates NOI of SEK 5m. Total return?

→ C) 9%

Canvas Example MCQ — Q12

  • A) 4%
  • B) 5%
  • C) 9%
  • D) 109%
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

(104-100+5)/100 = 9/100 = 9%.

Rule: Total return = 4% value growth + 5% income yield.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Stock starts at SEK 100, ends at SEK 108, and pays SEK 4 dividend. Total return?

→ C) 12%

Canvas Example MCQ — Q15

  • A) 4%
  • B) 8%
  • C) 12%
  • D) 112%
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

(108-100+4)/100 = 12%.

Rule: Price return + dividend yield.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Stock rises from SEK 80 to SEK 92 and pays SEK 4 dividend. Total return?

→ C) 20%

Canvas Example MCQ — Q17

  • A) 15%
  • B) 18%
  • C) 20%
  • D) 25%
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

(92-80+4)/80 = 16/80 = 20%.

Rule: Add dividend before dividing by beginning price.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Stock falls from SEK 100 to SEK 96 and pays SEK 6 dividend. Total return?

→ B) 2%

Canvas Example MCQ — Q18

  • A) -4%
  • B) 2%
  • C) 6%
  • D) 10%
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

(96-100+6)/100 = 2%.

Rule: Negative capital gain does not imply negative total return.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Beginning stock price SEK 120, dividend SEK 6, total return 15%. Find ending price.

→ B) SEK 132

Canvas Example MCQ — Q19

  • A) SEK 126
  • B) SEK 132
  • C) SEK 138
  • D) SEK 144
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

0.15 = (P1-120+6)/120. Multiply by 120: 18 = P1-114, so P1 = 132.

Rule: Rearrange total-return formula when one component is missing.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Beginning price SEK 200, ending price SEK 216, total return 12%. Find dividend.

→ B) SEK 8

Canvas Example MCQ — Q20

  • A) SEK 4
  • B) SEK 8
  • C) SEK 16
  • D) SEK 24
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

0.12 = (216-200+D)/200. Thus 24 = 16 + D, so D = 8.

Rule: Total-return identity can be solved for dividend/income.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Stock A: 100->110, no dividend. Stock B: 100->104 plus SEK 6 dividend. Which has higher total return?

→ C) Both stocks have the same total return.

Canvas Example MCQ — Q21

  • A) Stock A has the higher total return.
  • B) Stock B has the higher total return.
  • C) Both stocks have the same total return.
  • D) Stock B has twice the total return of Stock A.
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

A = 10/100 = 10%. B = (4+6)/100 = 10%.

Rule: Compare total return, not price change alone.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Nominal total return 4%, inflation 6%. Approximate real return?

→ A) -2%

Canvas Example MCQ — Q26

  • A) -2%
  • B) 2%
  • C) 4%
  • D) 10%
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

4% - 6% = -2%.

Rule: Positive nominal return can mean lost purchasing power.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Stock 100->108, dividend 4, inflation 3%. Approximate real total return?

→ C) 9%

Canvas Example MCQ — Q29

  • A) 5%
  • B) 8%
  • C) 9%
  • D) 12%
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

Nominal total return = (108-100+4)/100 = 12%. Approximate real = 12%-3% = 9%.

Rule: First compute total nominal return, then adjust for inflation.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Same stock: nominal total return 12%, inflation 3%. Exact real total return?

→ A) 8.74%

Canvas Example MCQ — Q30

  • A) 8.74%
  • B) 9.00%
  • C) 12.00%
  • D) 15.00%
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

1.12/1.03 - 1 = 0.08738 = 8.74%.

Rule: Do not use simple subtraction when exact is requested.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Stock 100->98, dividend 7, inflation 2%. Approximate real total return?

→ B) 3%

Canvas Example MCQ — Q31

  • A) 1%
  • B) 3%
  • C) 5%
  • D) 7%
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

Nominal total = (98-100+7)/100 = 5%. Real ≈ 5%-2% = 3%.

Rule: Income can offset a price decline.

Returns & CompoundingE-level★ High priority — official Canvas example

Property begins at SEK 200m, ends at SEK 212m, NOI SEK 8m, inflation 12%. Which statement is correct?

→ B) The nominal total return is 10%, and the approximate real return is -2%.

Canvas Example MCQ — Q32

  • A) The nominal total return is 6%, and the real return is positive.
  • B) The nominal total return is 10%, and the approximate real return is -2%.
  • C) The nominal total return is 12%, and the approximate real return is 0%.
  • D) The nominal total return is 10%, and the exact real return is -2%.
  • E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.

Nominal total = (212-200+8)/200 = 20/200 = 10%. Approx real = 10%-12% = -2%. Exact real = 1.10/1.12-1 ≈ -1.79%.

Rule: Distinguish nominal gain from purchasing-power gain.

DCF / NPV / IRRE-levelVery high priority

You are a rich student as usual, and therefore you will invest a small portion of your huge wealth in a Drisky office building in downtown San Fransico. You assume that the office building will generate annual cash flows forever (in perpetuity). One year from now, your investment will pay you $2 million. You also assume that the yearly payments will grow with a nice constant annual growth rate in perpetuity of 3% (g = 3%). The present value of the growing cash flow is $25 000 000. You assume that the risk- free rate of return (the risk-free discount rate) is 6%. Then the risk premia must be_____.

→ B) 5.00 %

Old Exam — Oct 2023, Q2

  • A) 5.24 %
  • B) 5.00 %
  • C) 11.24 %.
  • D) 11.00 %.
  • E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.

Growing perpetuity: PV=CF1/(r-g). 25=2/(r-g) -> r-g=8%. Total required return r=11%. Risk premium =11%-6%=5% -> B.

Rule: Recognize cash-flow timing first. Discount each cash flow; terminal/sale proceeds are added in the sale year. IRR is the rate that sets NPV=0.

DCF / NPV / IRRE-levelVery high priority

Your investment pays you annual cash flows of $25 000 for the next 40 years. Year 40, your investment also pays you $500 000 (in addition to the $25 000). As usual all payments occur at the end of each year. Your required rate of return (the discount rate) is 5.5%. The present value of the cash flow is_______.

→ C) $459 885

Old Exam — Oct 2021, Q1

  • A) $401153
  • B) $2 500 000
  • C) $459 885
  • D) $974 174
  • E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.

The easiest way to solve this is to split the investment into two parts:

  1. Annual cash flows: $25,000 every year for 40 years.
  2. Final payment: an additional $500,000 at the end of year 40.

Step 1: Present value of annual payments

Use the annuity formula:

PV1=Cr(1−1(1+r)n)PV_1 = \frac{C}{r}\left(1 - \frac{1}{(1+r)^n}\right)
  • C = 25,000 (annual cash flow)
  • r = 0.055 (discount rate)
  • n = 40 (number of years)

Insert the numbers:

PV1=25,0000.055(1−11.05540)≈$401,153PV_1 = \frac{25{,}000}{0.055}\left(1 - \frac{1}{1.055^{40}}\right) \approx \$401{,}153

Step 2: Present value of the final payment

Discount the additional final payment back to today:

PV2=FV(1+r)nPV_2 = \frac{FV}{(1+r)^n}
  • FV = 500,000 (additional final payment)
  • The year-40 annual payment is already included in Step 1.

Insert the numbers:

PV2=500,0001.05540≈$58,732PV_2 = \frac{500{,}000}{1.055^{40}} \approx \$58{,}732

Step 3: Add them together

Calculate the present value of each part, then add them together.

Annual payments (PV)
$401,153
Final payment (PV)
$58,732
Total present value
$459,885

Rule: For an annuity plus an additional final payment: PV = (C/r)[1 − (1+r)⁻ⁿ] + FV/(1+r)ⁿ. Include the last annual payment once, and discount the additional payment separately.

Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priority

Suppose that you invested $10 000 in January 1998. What was the value of that investment in September 2021?

→ B) $82 022.

Old Exam — Oct 2021, Q9

Given: Historical REIT index-data question; current adaptation: ending value = initial value x ending total-return index / starting index.

  • A) $24 641.
  • B) $82 022.
  • C) $104 224.
  • D) $720 000.
  • E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.

Historical external-data result: B) $82 022.. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.

Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.

Chi-square & Time SeriesD–A levelLegacy / lower priority

Using the table, what is the null hypothesis of the chi-square test?

→ B) There is no relationship between the primary reason for not returning and the hotel.

Old Exam — Dec 2022, Q14

Given: Hotel table (counts): Price 18/9/36; Location 23/15/42; Room 9/8/16; Other 12/14/25 across three hotels.

  • A) There is a relationship between the primary reason for not returning and the hotel.
  • B) There is no relationship between the primary reason for not returning and the hotel.
  • C) There is a positive relationship between the primary reason for not returning and the hotel.
  • D) There is a negative relationship between the primary reason for not returning and the hotel.
  • E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.

Chi-square workflow: H0=no association/same proportions; E=(row total x column total)/grand total; statistic=sum((O-E)^2/E); df=(r-1) (c-1); reject if p<alpha or statistic>critical. Source answer: B) There is no relationship between the primary reason for not returning and the hotel..

Rule: Use expected counts, df=(r-1)(c-1), and p-value/critical-value decision rules.

DCF / NPV / IRRE-levelVery high priority

A property has Initial NOI = $100,000, with 3% constant annual NOI growth. Required return r = 12%, terminal cap rate = 9%, holding period = 5 years. Calculate the property value using a 5-year DCF where the Year 5 reversion value uses Year 6 NOI.

→ A) $1,111,111.11

Computer Lab 1 — Exercise 1, Base Case

  • A) $1,111,111.11
  • B) $1,288,082.30
  • C) $1,000,000.00
  • D) $833,333.33
  • E) $1,400,633.19

NOI grows at 3%/yr: NOI1=100,000...NOI6=115,927.41. Reversion value = NOI6/0.09 = 1,288,082.30. Year5 total CF = NOI5+RV5 = 1,400,633.19. Discounting all CFs at 12% and summing PVs gives Property Value = $1,111,111.11.

Rule: DCF property value = sum of PV(NOI1..5) + PV(reversion), where reversion uses NOI of the year AFTER sale divided by terminal cap rate.

DCF / NPV / IRRD–A levelVery high priority

Case A (excess supply): Initial NOI = $100,000 with 0% growth in Years 1-3, then 3% growth thereafter. Required return = 12%, terminal cap rate = 9%, 5-year hold. NOI6 = $109,272.70. What is the property value?

→ A) $1,054,776.08

Computer Lab 1 — Exercise 1, Case A

  • A) $1,054,776.08
  • B) $1,111,111.11
  • C) $1,214,141.11
  • D) $1,166,992.19

RV5 = NOI6/0.09 = 109,272.70/0.09 = 1,214,141.11. Year5 total CF = 106,090+1,214,141.11=1,320,231.11. Discount all years 1-5 at 12%: PVs are 89,285.71+79,719.39+71,178.02+65,458.36+749,134.59 = $1,054,776.08.

Rule: Flat short-term NOI growth before resuming long-term growth lowers both NOI and reversion value, reducing property value versus the Base Case.

Mortgage & LeverageD–A levelHigh priority

The PV of the equity interest in an income property is $666,035.37, and the PV of the mortgage (loan amount today) is $1,079,423.11. Year-1 NOI is $150,000. What is the total property value and implied going-in (overall) cap rate?

→ A) Property value ≈ $1,745,458.48; cap rate ≈ 8.59%

Computer Lab 2 — Exercise 1(b)(c)

  • A) Property value ≈ $1,745,458.48; cap rate ≈ 8.59%
  • B) Property value ≈ $1,745,458.48; cap rate ≈ 12.00%
  • C) Property value ≈ $1,079,423.11; cap rate ≈ 13.90%
  • D) Property value ≈ $413,387.74; cap rate ≈ 36.29%

Property Value = PV(equity)+PV(mortgage) = 666,035.37+1,079,423.11 = $1,745,458.48. Going-in cap rate = NOI1/Property Value = 150,000/1,745,458.48 ≈ 8.59%.

Rule: Total property value = PV of debt claim + PV of equity claim. Going-in cap rate = Year-1 NOI ÷ total property value.

Returns & CompoundingD–A levelVery high priority

Three investment scenarios each turn $100 into $350 of total cash returned over 5 years, but with different cash-flow timing: Scenario 1 (all at end) has IRR=28.47%, Scenario 2 (spread over time) has IRR=44.34%, Scenario 3 (more return early) has IRR=56.95%. Why do all three scenarios share the same CAGR (28.47%) and Investment Multiple (3.5x), yet have different IRRs?

→ A) CAGR and Multiple depend only on beginning and ending wealth over the whole period, while IRR also accounts for the timing of each interim cash flow

Computer Lab 2 — Exercise 2A

  • A) CAGR and Multiple depend only on beginning and ending wealth over the whole period, while IRR also accounts for the timing of each interim cash flow
  • B) The calculations contain an error — equal multiples must always produce equal IRRs
  • C) IRR is independent of timing; the difference must come from rounding
  • D) Multiple and CAGR used a different total cash amount in each scenario

Multiple = total cash returned/initial investment = 350/100 = 3.5x and CAGR = 3.5^(1/5)-1 = 28.47% for all three, since total dollars and duration are identical. IRR, however, is sensitive to WHEN cash is received: receiving money earlier allows it to be 'reinvested' implicitly at the IRR, raising the computed IRR.

Rule: Multiple and CAGR are driven only by beginning/ending wealth; IRR is additionally sensitive to the timing of interim cash flows.

Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priority

For historical S&P 500 annual total returns including dividends, which formula correctly calculates the annual total return R_t?

→ A) R_t = (P_t − P_(t-1) + D_t) / P_(t-1)

Computer Lab 2 — Exercise 2B(i)

  • A) R_t = (P_t − P_(t-1) + D_t) / P_(t-1)
  • B) R_t = (P_t − P_(t-1)) / P_t
  • C) R_t = D_t / P_(t-1)
  • D) R_t = P_t / D_t − 1

Total return includes both the capital gain (P_t − P_(t-1)) and the dividend (D_t), both divided by the beginning price P_(t-1).

Rule: Total return = (capital gain + income/dividends) / beginning value.

Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priority

S&P 500 annual total returns for 2000-2025 (26 years) sum to 248.89%. What is the Arithmetic Average Historical Return?

→ A) 9.57%

Computer Lab 2 — Exercise 2B(ii)

  • A) 9.57%
  • B) 7.99%
  • C) 248.89%
  • D) 12.04%

Arithmetic mean = Sum of returns / n = 248.89% / 26 = 9.57%.

Rule: Arithmetic mean = (R1+R2+...+Rn)/n — a simple average of each period's return.

Regression BasicsE-levelVery high priority

In a market-model regression of a stock's return on the market return, what does R² represent, as distinct from beta?

→ A) R² measures the proportion of the stock's return variation explained by the market, while beta is the slope coefficient (market sensitivity)

Computer Lab 3 — Exercise 2, important distinction

  • A) R² measures the proportion of the stock's return variation explained by the market, while beta is the slope coefficient (market sensitivity)
  • B) R² and beta measure exactly the same thing and can be used interchangeably
  • C) R² is the stock's total risk, while beta is its unsystematic (idiosyncratic) risk
  • D) R² is always equal to beta squared

Beta is the regression slope, quantifying how much the stock return moves per unit of market return. R² is the goodness-of-fit measure, indicating what fraction of the stock's return variance is explained by the market factor — two conceptually distinct statistics.

Rule: Beta = sensitivity to the market (slope); R² = how much of the variance is explained by that market relationship (fit quality). A high beta does not imply a high R², and vice versa.