Search
11 questions · 1 formulas
Variance & SD
Var = p1(R1−E)² + p2(R2−E)² + p3(R3−E)² σ = √Var
Trap: Don't divide by n — probabilities do the weighting.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priorityThe country that has the highest (maximum) standard deviation of the mean quarterly returns is________.
→ D) Croatia with standard deviation of 24.05 %
Old Exam — Dec 2021 re-exam, Q8
Given: Historical HPI dataset question; keep the concept of comparing standard deviations.
- A) Slovenia with standard deviation of 24.97 %
- B) Slovenia with standard deviation of 58.79 %
- C) Croatia with standard deviation of 35.20 %
- D) Croatia with standard deviation of 24.05 %
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: D) Croatia with standard deviation of 24.05 %. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Scenario RiskD–A levelVery high priorityIn the Centre Point two-way sensitivity analysis, as LTV increases from 0% to 90%, Mean IRR rises from 12.25% to 29.71%, while the standard deviation rises from 1.98% to 10.21%, and Mean/Std.Dev. falls from 6.18x to 2.91x. What does this indicate about leverage?
→ A) Leverage increases expected return but increases risk proportionally even more, lowering the risk-adjusted return ratio
Computer Lab 1 — Exercise 2C
- A) Leverage increases expected return but increases risk proportionally even more, lowering the risk-adjusted return ratio
- B) Leverage increases expected return with no effect on risk
- C) Leverage decreases both expected return and risk
- D) Leverage has no effect on return or risk, only on cash flow timing
Both mean IRR and σ rise with LTV, but σ rises faster (1.98%→10.21%, a ~5.2x increase vs. mean IRR's ~2.4x increase), so the Mean/Std.Dev ratio falls from 6.18x to 2.91x — risk grows faster than return.
Rule: Financial leverage magnifies both expected equity returns and the variability (risk) of those returns; risk generally grows faster than return as leverage increases.
Scenario RiskD–A levelVery high priorityInvestment I: scenarios Optimistic 15%(20%), Most likely 10%(60%), Pessimistic 5%(20%). Investment II: Optimistic 20%(20%), Most likely 15%(60%), Pessimistic 5%(20%). Using the Coefficient of Variation (CV = σ/E[IRR]), which investment has less risk per unit of expected return?
→ A) Investment I (CV=0.316) is lower risk per unit of return than Investment II (CV=0.350)
Computer Lab 1 — Exercise 3 Problem 2
- A) Investment I (CV=0.316) is lower risk per unit of return than Investment II (CV=0.350)
- B) Investment II is lower risk per unit of return because it has a lower standard deviation
- C) Both investments have identical CV
- D) Investment II is better because its expected IRR (14%) is higher
E[IRR]_I=10%, σ_I=3.16%, CV_I=0.316. E[IRR]_II=14%, σ_II=4.90%, CV_II=0.350. Lower CV means less risk per unit of expected return, so Investment I has the better risk-adjusted profile by this measure, even though II has a higher expected IRR.
Rule: Coefficient of Variation (σ/E[R]) measures risk per unit of expected return; lower CV means better reward-to-risk (though this does not mean universally 'better').
Scenario RiskD–A levelVery high priorityProblem 3 unlevered scenario IRRs are Pessimistic 7.93% (p=30%), Most likely 10.00% (p=40%), Optimistic 12.12% (p=30%). What are the expected IRR and standard deviation?
→ A) E[IRR]≈10.01%, σ≈1.62%
Computer Lab 1 — Exercise 3 Problem 3
- A) E[IRR]≈10.01%, σ≈1.62%
- B) E[IRR]≈10.02%, σ≈2.19%
- C) E[IRR]≈10.68%, σ≈1.62%
- D) E[IRR]≈10.01%, σ≈4.90%
E[IRR]=0.30(7.93%)+0.40(10.00%)+0.30(12.12%)=10.01%. Variance=Σp(IRR−E[IRR])²≈0.00026296, σ=√0.00026296≈1.62%.
Rule: Standard deviation = √[Σ p_i × (R_i − E[R])²] using scenario probabilities.
Scenario RiskD–A levelVery high priorityComparing Problem 3 (unlevered: E[IRR]=10.01%, σ=1.62%) to Problem 4 (levered with a $1.5m/10%/15yr loan: E[Equity IRR]=10.14%, σ=5.52%), has adding leverage increased the equity investor's risk?
→ A) Yes — standard deviation rises from 1.62% to 5.52% while expected return rises only slightly, because fixed debt service makes equity a residual claim
Computer Lab 1 — Exercise 3 Problem 4
- A) Yes — standard deviation rises from 1.62% to 5.52% while expected return rises only slightly, because fixed debt service makes equity a residual claim
- B) No — leverage has almost no effect since expected return barely changed
- C) No — standard deviation actually falls with leverage because debt diversifies risk
- D) Cannot be determined without knowing the loan's credit rating
Fixed debt service must be paid regardless of NOI outcome, so equity cash flows (the residual) swing proportionally more with property performance. Standard deviation more than triples (1.62%→5.52%) while expected return only rises slightly (10.01%→10.14%).
Rule: Financial leverage magnifies equity risk because debt service is a fixed prior claim; equity absorbs the full variability on a proportionally smaller base.
Scenario RiskD–A levelVery high priorityInvestment I has scenario IRRs 15%(p=20%), 10%(p=60%), 5%(p=20%), with E[IRR]=10%. What is the standard deviation of IRR?
→ A) ≈3.16%
Computer Lab 3 — Problem 2
- A) ≈3.16%
- B) ≈5.00%
- C) ≈1.00%
- D) ≈10.00%
Variance = 0.20×(0.15−0.10)²+0.60×(0.10−0.10)²+0.20×(0.05−0.10)² = 0.20×0.0025+0+0.20×0.0025 = 0.0010. σ=√0.0010=0.03162=3.16%.
Rule: σ = √[Σ p_i(R_i−E[R])²].
Scenario RiskD–A levelVery high priorityInvestment I: IRRs 15%/10%/5% in Optimistic/Most likely/Pessimistic (same probabilities 20%/60%/20%). Investment II: IRRs 20%/15%/5% in the same scenarios. In every single scenario, Investment II's IRR is at least as high as Investment I's. What can we conclude?
→ A) Investment II first-order stochastically dominates Investment I; any investor who prefers more return to less should choose II despite its higher standard deviation
Computer Lab 3 — Problem 2
- A) Investment II first-order stochastically dominates Investment I; any investor who prefers more return to less should choose II despite its higher standard deviation
- B) Investment I dominates because it has lower standard deviation (3.16% vs 4.90%)
- C) Neither dominates since II has higher risk
- D) They are equally good since both have the same Pessimistic-scenario IRR (5%)
Because Investment II's IRR is strictly ≥ Investment I's IRR in every state of the world (20%>15%, 15%>10%, 5%=5%), II dominates I regardless of risk preferences — a rational investor would never choose I over II here.
Rule: If one investment's payoff is at least as good in every scenario (and better in at least one), it first-order stochastically dominates — risk aversion is irrelevant to this comparison.
Scenario RiskD–A levelVery high priorityComparing unlevered (E[IRR]=10.01%, σ=1.62%) to levered (E[IRR]=10.14%, σ=5.52%) for the same property, has the $1.5m loan increased risk, and why?
→ A) Yes — σ rises from 1.62% to 5.52% because fixed debt service makes equity a residual claim, amplifying the effect of NOI/sale-price changes on equity returns
Computer Lab 3 — Problem 4B
- A) Yes — σ rises from 1.62% to 5.52% because fixed debt service makes equity a residual claim, amplifying the effect of NOI/sale-price changes on equity returns
- B) No — expected return only rose slightly (10.01%→10.14%), so risk is essentially unchanged
- C) No — leverage reduces risk by diversifying the capital structure
- D) Risk is unchanged because E[IRR]/σ actually increased with leverage
σ more than triples (1.62%→5.52%). Because debt service is fixed, all variability in property performance (NOI, sale price) flows through to the smaller equity base, magnifying the percentage swings in equity returns.
Rule: Leverage magnifies equity-return volatility because debt holders are paid first (fixed claim) while equity absorbs all residual variability.
Scenario RiskD–A levelVery high priorityWhen comparing two risky investments using scenario analysis, which tool is the STRONGEST way to rank them if one investment's payoff is at least as high in every single scenario?
→ A) Direct scenario-by-scenario (state-by-state) comparison / first-order stochastic dominance — it requires no assumption about risk preference
Computer Lab 3 — Problem 2 recap
- A) Direct scenario-by-scenario (state-by-state) comparison / first-order stochastic dominance — it requires no assumption about risk preference
- B) The coefficient of variation (σ/E[R]), since it always gives the definitive ranking
- C) Standard deviation alone, since lower risk always wins
- D) Expected return alone, since higher return always wins
If an investment's payoff is ≥ in every scenario (state-by-state), it dominates regardless of any risk-preference assumption — this is a stronger and more general conclusion than CV, σ, or E[R] comparisons alone, each of which implicitly assumes something about risk tolerance or ignores risk entirely.
Rule: State-by-state (first-order stochastic) dominance, when it exists, is the strongest possible ranking tool because it holds for all risk preferences.
Normal DistributionE-levelVery high priorityMonthly return R ~ N(μ=1%, σ=4%). What is the probability of a negative monthly return, P(R<0)?
→ A) ≈40.13%
Computer Lab 6 — Exercise 2, (a)
- A) ≈40.13%
- B) ≈50.00%
- C) ≈25.00%
- D) ≈59.87%
z = (0−0.01)/0.04 = −0.25. P(R<0) = Φ(−0.25) ≈ 0.4013 = 40.13%.
Rule: Standardize with z=(x−μ)/σ, then use Φ(z) for a left-tail probability.
Scenario RiskE-level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleInvestment I has BTIRRs of 15%, 10% and 5% with probabilities 0.20, 0.60 and 0.20. Find the standard deviation of BTIRR.
→ D) 3.16%
Canvas Example MCQ — Q9
- A) 0.10%
- B) 5.00%
- C) 31.60%
- D) 3.16%
- E) None of the above is correct.
Mean = 10%. Variance = 0.20(15−10)² + 0.60(10−10)² + 0.20(5−10)² = 10. SD = √10 ≈ 3.16%.
Rule: Risk = √[Σ p(R − E[R])²]