Search
14 questions · 1 formulas
Omitted variable bias — two conditions
Bias if Z affects Y AND Z is correlated with an included X
Trap: Only one condition → no bias.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleIf an omitted variable is a determinant of Y, when is the OLS estimator of included X biased?
→ D) The OLS estimator is biased if the omitted variable is correlated with the included variable.
Canvas Example MCQ — Q75
- A) You cannot measure the omitted variable's effect, but included-variable estimators are unaffected.
- B) There is no effect on included-variable estimators because the other variable is not included.
- C) The OLS estimator of the included variable is always biased.
- D) The OLS estimator is biased if the omitted variable is correlated with the included variable.
OVB requires both relevance for Y and correlation with included X.
Rule: Memorize the two-condition rule.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleWhen does omitted-variable bias exist?
→ D) exists if the omitted variable is correlated with an included regressor and is a determinant of Y.
Canvas Example MCQ — Q76
- A) is always present whenever R-squared < 1.
- B) is always present but negligible in almost all economic examples.
- C) exists if the omitted variable is correlated with an included regressor but is not a determinant of Y.
- D) exists if the omitted variable is correlated with an included regressor and is a determinant of Y.
This is the two-condition rule stated directly.
Rule: Both conditions, not either one.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleOVB occurs when an omitted variable...
→ B) affects the dependent variable and is correlated with at least one included regressor.
Canvas Example MCQ — Q78
- A) is unrelated to both the dependent variable and the included regressors.
- B) affects the dependent variable and is correlated with at least one included regressor.
- C) is correlated with an included regressor but has no effect on the dependent variable.
- D) affects the dependent variable but is uncorrelated with all included regressors.
- E) None of the above.
That statement contains both required conditions.
Rule: Two conditions.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleAn omitted variable affects Y but is uncorrelated with all included regressors. Does it create OVB?
→ C) No, because correlation with an included regressor is also required.
Canvas Example MCQ — Q79
- A) Yes, always.
- B) Yes, if the sample size is small.
- C) No, because correlation with an included regressor is also required.
- D) No, because omitted variables can never cause bias.
- E) None of the above.
Condition 1 holds but condition 2 does not.
Rule: One condition alone is insufficient.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleAn omitted variable is correlated with X1 but has no effect on Y. Does it bias the estimated coefficient on X1?
→ C) No, because the omitted variable must also be a determinant of Y.
Canvas Example MCQ — Q80
- A) Yes, always.
- B) Yes, because correlation with X1 is sufficient.
- C) No, because the omitted variable must also be a determinant of Y.
- D) No, unless X1 is a dummy variable.
- E) None of the above.
Condition 2 holds but condition 1 does not.
Rule: Correlation alone is insufficient.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleWhich two conditions are required for OVB?
→ B) The omitted variable must affect Y and be correlated with an included regressor.
Canvas Example MCQ — Q81
- A) The omitted variable must have a large variance and a non-zero mean.
- B) The omitted variable must affect Y and be correlated with an included regressor.
- C) The omitted variable must be normally distributed and correlated with Y.
- D) The omitted variable must be statistically significant and correlated with the error term.
- E) None of the above.
Exactly the two-condition rule.
Rule: Memorize verbatim.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleTrue/False: if omitted variable affects Y but is uncorrelated with every included regressor, omission does not create OVB in OLS slopes.
→ A) True
Canvas Example MCQ — Q82
- A) True
- B) False
- C) True only in large samples
- D) True only if R-squared is high
- E) None of the above.
No correlation with included X means the omission does not systematically contaminate the included slope coefficients through OVB.
Rule: Effect on Y alone is not enough.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleHouse prices are regressed on floor area; neighbourhood quality is omitted. When is OVB likely?
→ A) Neighbourhood quality affects house prices and is correlated with floor area.
Canvas Example MCQ — Q83
- A) Neighbourhood quality affects house prices and is correlated with floor area.
- B) Neighbourhood quality affects house prices but is completely unrelated to floor area.
- C) Neighbourhood quality is correlated with floor area but does not affect house prices.
- D) Neighbourhood quality is measured in categories rather than numbers.
- E) None of the above.
Both required conditions are satisfied.
Rule: Apply the two conditions to the story.
Model Fit & RMSED–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleA multiple regression has adjusted R² = 0.68. Closest interpretation?
→ A) Approximately 68% of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the model, after adjusting for the number of estimated parameters.
Canvas Example MCQ — Q87
- A) Approximately 68% of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the model, after adjusting for the number of estimated parameters.
- B) 68% of the explanatory variables are statistically significant.
- C) The model predicts the dependent variable correctly for exactly 68% of observations.
- D) The remaining 32% must be caused by omitted-variable bias.
- E) None of the above.
This is the source’s approximate interpretation. It is not 68% significant variables and not 68% correctly predicted observations.
Rule: Do not confuse fit with significance or classification accuracy.
Regression BasicsD–A levelVery high priorityIn econometric modelling the assumption of strict exogeneity implies that_____
→ A) cov(xi, ej) = 0: there is no correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i.
Old Exam — Dec 2021 re-exam, Q19
- A) cov(xi, ej) = 0: there is no correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i.
- B) cov(xi, ej) ≠ 0: there is positive or negative correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i.
- C) cov(xi, ej) > 0: there is strict positive correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i
- D) cov(xi, ej) < 0: there is strict negative correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is correct.
Strict exogeneity means no correlation between regressors and errors across all observations/time periods: Cov(x_i,e_j)=0 -> A.
Rule: Identify model units and form before calculating. Never confuse coefficient size, significance, R2 and prediction accuracy.
Regression BasicsD–A levelVery high priorityIn econometric modelling the assumption of strict exogeneity implies that_____
→ A) cov(xi, ej) = 0: there is no correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i.
Old Exam — Oct 2021, Q16
- A) cov(xi, ej) = 0: there is no correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i.
- B) cov(xi, ej) ≠ 0: there is positive or negative correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i.
- C) cov(xi, ej) > 0: there is strict positive correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i
- D) cov(xi, ej) < 0: there is strict negative correlation between the omitted factors (variables) associated with the observation j and the value of the explanatory variable for observation i
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is correct.
Strict exogeneity requires regressors to be uncorrelated with the error in every time period: Cov(x_i,e_j)=0 -> A.
Rule: Identify model units and form before calculating. Never confuse coefficient size, significance, R2 and prediction accuracy.
Regression BasicsE-levelVery high priorityIn a multiple regression, the coefficient βj measures the change in expected Y for a one-unit change in Xj, holding other included regressors constant. Is this partial effect automatically a causal effect?
→ A) False — it is a conditional association and is causal only under additional identification assumptions
Computer Lab 4 — Exercise 2, Task 2
- A) False — it is a conditional association and is causal only under additional identification assumptions
- B) True — any regression coefficient is causal by construction
- C) True, but only when R² exceeds 0.70
- D) False — coefficients from regression are always meaningless
Holding the other included regressors constant removes their confounding influence only, not all possible confounding from omitted variables; causal interpretation requires further assumptions (e.g., no omitted confounders, correct functional form).
Rule: Partial association ≠ causal effect unless identification assumptions hold.
Omitted Variable BiasE-levelHigh priorityFor an omitted variable to cause omitted variable bias (OVB) in the estimated STR coefficient, which two conditions must both hold for the omitted variable?
→ A) It must affect the dependent variable (test scores) AND be correlated with an included regressor (e.g., STR)
Computer Lab 4 — Exercise 2, Task 5
- A) It must affect the dependent variable (test scores) AND be correlated with an included regressor (e.g., STR)
- B) It must be measured in the same units as STR
- C) It must be correlated with the dependent variable only
- D) It must be uncorrelated with all included regressors
OVB requires the omitted factor to (1) influence Y and (2) be correlated with an included regressor; if either condition fails, omitting it does not bias that coefficient.
Rule: Two OVB conditions: affects Y AND correlated with an included regressor — both must hold.
Omitted Variable BiasD–A levelHigh priorityThe STR coefficient falls in magnitude from -2.280 (Model 1, no controls) to -1.014 (Model 5, with controls), while its sign stays negative. What is the best interpretation?
→ A) This pattern is consistent with omitted variable bias in Model 1, but the coefficient change alone does not prove STR's effect is causal
Computer Lab 4 — Exercise 2, Task 6 (comparison)
- A) This pattern is consistent with omitted variable bias in Model 1, but the coefficient change alone does not prove STR's effect is causal
- B) This proves Model 1 was causal and Model 5 is biased
- C) This proves STR has no real relationship with test scores
- D) This change in magnitude automatically makes the Model 5 coefficient statistically insignificant
A shrinking coefficient magnitude after adding plausible confounders is consistent with OVB in the simpler model, but establishing causality requires more than observing a coefficient change; significance must be checked separately using SEs/t-stats.
Rule: Coefficient movement across specifications is suggestive of OVB, not conclusive proof of causality or (in)significance.