Search
19 questions · 1 formulas
CAGR from index
g = (End / Start)^(1/n) − 1
ProbitD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleProbit: z = -4.60 + .40 FIXRATE - .20 MARGIN + .10 NETWORTH. At FIXRATE=12, MARGIN=2, NETWORTH=7, predicted probability?
→ C) approximately 69.1%
Canvas Example MCQ — Q89
- A) approximately 30.9%
- B) approximately 50.0%
- C) approximately 69.1%
- D) approximately 84.1%
- E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.
z = -4.60 + .40(12) - .20(2) + .10(7) = 0.50. P = Φ(0.50) ≈ 0.6915 = 69.15%.
Rule: Compute the index first; then apply the standard normal CDF.
ProbitD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleSame Probit point; MARGIN coefficient = -0.20 and φ(0.50)=0.3521. Marginal effect of MARGIN?
→ C) approximately -7.0 percentage points
Canvas Example MCQ — Q90
- A) approximately -20.0 percentage points
- B) approximately -15.2 percentage points
- C) approximately -7.0 percentage points
- D) approximately +7.0 percentage points
- E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.
ME = -0.20 x 0.3521 = -0.07042, i.e. about -7.04 percentage points for a one-unit local increase in MARGIN.
Rule: Probit ME = coefficient x normal PDF at the current index.
LogitD–A level★ High priority — official Canvas exampleSame Logit with FIXRATE=12, MARGIN=2, NETWORTH=3. Marginal effect of MARGIN?
→ C) approximately -7.5 percentage points
Canvas Example MCQ — Q93
Given: Logit model for choosing an adjustable-rate mortgage. At FIXRATE=12, MARGIN=2, NETWORTH=3 the index is z = −0.80. MARGIN coefficient = −0.35. Logit: P = 1/(1+e^(−z)); marginal effect = b·P·(1−P).
- A) approximately -35.0 percentage points
- B) approximately -12.8 percentage points
- C) approximately -7.5 percentage points
- D) approximately +7.5 percentage points
- E) None of A-D is close; write the correct answer.
z=-0.80, P≈0.3100. ME = (-.35)(.31)(.69) = -.0749 ≈ -7.49 pp.
Rule: Logit ME = β x P(1-P).
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high prioritySuppose that you purchased a house in the US 2000:Q1 for $2.5 million. If the price of that house has followed the US house price index until 2022:Q2, what is the geometric mean quarterly return of your house investment? How much was the house worth 2022:Q2?
→ D) The geometric mean returns is 1.113 %, and the house was worth $ 6 692 431
Old Exam — Oct 2022, Q9
Given: Historical HPI dataset question. Current adaptation: ending value = initial value x index_end/index_start; geometric quarterly return = (ending/beginning)^(1/n)-1.
- A) The geometric mean returns is 1.126 %, and the house was worth $6 772 849
- B) The geometric mean returns is 1.279 %, and the house was worth $ 7 749 444
- C) The geometric mean returns is 1.240 %, and the house was worth $ 7 485 119
- D) The geometric mean returns is 1.113 %, and the house was worth $ 6 692 431
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: D) The geometric mean returns is 1.113 %, and the house was worth $ 6 692 431. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priorityThe country that has the highest (maximum) standard deviation of the mean quarterly returns is________.
→ D) Croatia with standard deviation of 24.05 %
Old Exam — Dec 2021 re-exam, Q8
Given: Historical HPI dataset question; keep the concept of comparing standard deviations.
- A) Slovenia with standard deviation of 24.97 %
- B) Slovenia with standard deviation of 58.79 %
- C) Croatia with standard deviation of 35.20 %
- D) Croatia with standard deviation of 24.05 %
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: D) Croatia with standard deviation of 24.05 %. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priorityIf you had invested SEK 250 000 in the Swedish housing market index 1975:Q1 (first quarter year 1975), then your investment is worth at the end of 2021:Q2 _________
→ C) SEK 4 323 050
Old Exam — Dec 2021 re-exam, Q9
Given: Historical HPI index-growth question; current adaptation: V_end=V_start x Index_end/Index_start.
- A) SEK 8 549 279.
- B) SEK 2 454 658.
- C) SEK 4 323 050
- D) SEK 4 393 259.
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: C) SEK 4 323 050. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priorityThe pairwise correlation coefficient of quarterly returns between Sweden and UK is
→ A) 0.52
Old Exam — Dec 2021 re-exam, Q10
Given: Historical correlation question. Correlation is a unit-free number between -1 and +1; 0.52 means 0.52, not 52%.
- A) 0.52
- B) 52.
- C) 0.52 %.
- D) 1.00 %.
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: A) 0.52. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingD–A levelVery high priorityFor the entire time period, December 1971 to September 2021, what is the monthly geometric mean return?
→ B) 0.93%.
Old Exam — Dec 2021 re-exam, Q11
Given: Historical REIT data; geometric monthly mean is compound growth rate.
- A) 1.05%.
- B) 0.93%.
- C) 12.05%.
- D) 2.25%.
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: B) 0.93%.. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingD–A levelVery high priorityFor the entire time period, December 1971 to September 2021, what is the monthly arithmetic mean return?
→ A) 1.05%.
Old Exam — Dec 2021 re-exam, Q12
Given: Historical REIT data; arithmetic monthly mean is simple average of monthly returns.
- A) 1.05%.
- B) 0.93%.
- C) 12.05%.
- D) 2.25%.
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: A) 1.05%.. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priorityThe country that has the highest (maximum) arithmetic mean quarterly return is________.
→ D) Croatia with arithmetic mean return of 11.62 %
Old Exam — Oct 2021, Q6
Given: Historical HPI dataset question; keep the concept of comparing arithmetic means across countries.
- A) Slovenia with arithmetic mean return of 9.30 %
- B) Israel with arithmetic mean return of 6.79 %
- C) Sweden with arithmetic mean return of 11.62 %
- D) Croatia with arithmetic mean return of 11.62 %
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: D) Croatia with arithmetic mean return of 11.62 %. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priorityThe lowest (minimum) and highest (maximum) simple return observed among all countries and quarters is _________
→ A) ‒17.4% and 192.7%
Old Exam — Oct 2021, Q7
Given: Historical HPI dataset question; keep the concept of min/max simple returns.
- A) ‒17.4% and 192.7%
- B) ‒17.4% and 60.88%
- C) ‒17.4% and 120.78%
- D) ‒60.88% and 17.4%.
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: A) ‒17.4% and 192.7%. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priorityThe highest (maximum) pairwise correlation coefficient of quarterly returns is between
→ A) Croatia and Slovenia.
Old Exam — Oct 2021, Q8
Given: Historical HPI dataset question; keep the concept of comparing pairwise correlations.
- A) Croatia and Slovenia.
- B) UK and US.
- C) Sweden and Norway.
- D) Israel and Slovenia.
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: A) Croatia and Slovenia.. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high prioritySuppose that you invested $10 000 in January 1998. What was the value of that investment in September 2021?
→ B) $82 022.
Old Exam — Oct 2021, Q9
Given: Historical REIT index-data question; current adaptation: ending value = initial value x ending total-return index / starting index.
- A) $24 641.
- B) $82 022.
- C) $104 224.
- D) $720 000.
- E) None of the above (A, B, C, D) is close to be correct.
Historical external-data result: B) $82 022.. Current paper-exam use: if the needed index levels/returns are supplied, apply the relevant return, compounding or correlation formula by hand; do not depend on the old spreadsheet.
Rule: The old exam supplied a spreadsheet/software. For the 2026 paper exam, expect the necessary values/table/output to be printed. Use the method, not the historical data file.
ProbitE-levelVery high priorityIn a Probit model of choosing an adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM), MARGIN has a coefficient of −0.2675. What is the correct interpretation of the sign, and is −0.2675 itself a percentage-point effect?
→ A) A higher ARM margin makes choosing an adjustable-rate mortgage less attractive (negative sign); the raw coefficient is NOT a direct percentage-point probability effect
Computer Lab 6 — Exercise 3, Model 1 interpretation · adapted
- A) A higher ARM margin makes choosing an adjustable-rate mortgage less attractive (negative sign); the raw coefficient is NOT a direct percentage-point probability effect
- B) A higher ARM margin makes an ARM more attractive, and -0.2675 means exactly a 26.75 percentage-point decrease in probability
- C) The coefficient has no interpretable meaning in a Probit model
- D) -0.2675 is the exact percentage-point change in probability for a one-unit increase in MARGIN
The negative sign indicates direction (higher MARGIN lowers the attractiveness/probability of choosing ARM), but Probit coefficients are index-scale, not probability-scale; the actual probability effect requires multiplying by φ(Xβ), the marginal effect formula.
Rule: Probit coefficient signs indicate direction only; the probability-scale marginal effect requires β_j×φ(Xβ).
ProbitD–A levelVery high priorityUsing Model 1, P(ADJUST=1)=Φ[-7.0166+0.5301·FIXRATE-0.2675·MARGIN+0.0864·NETWORTH], compute the predicted probability for FIXRATE=12, MARGIN=2, NETWORTH=3. The linear index works out to z=-0.9312.
→ A) ≈17.59%
Computer Lab 6 — Exercise 3, Task c
- A) ≈17.59%
- B) ≈82.41%
- C) ≈37.21%
- D) ≈93.12%
P = Φ(-0.9312) ≈ 0.1759 = 17.59%, reading the standard normal CDF at z = -0.9312.
Rule: Compute z=Xβ first, then look up Φ(z) for the predicted probability.
ProbitD–A levelVery high priorityUsing the approximate Probit model P(DENY=1)=Φ[-2.26+2.74·PIRAT+0.71·BLACK], compute the linear index z for a Black applicant (BLACK=1) with PIRAT=0.35.
→ A) z = -2.26+2.74(0.35)+0.71(1) = -0.591
Computer Lab 6 — Exercise 4, Probit calc
- A) z = -2.26+2.74(0.35)+0.71(1) = -0.591
- B) z = -2.26+2.74(0.35) = -1.301
- C) z = -2.26+0.71 = -1.55
- D) z = 2.74(0.35)+0.71 = 1.669
z = -2.26 + 2.74×0.35 + 0.71×1 = -2.26 + 0.959 + 0.71 = -0.591.
Rule: Compute the full linear index z=Xβ by summing the intercept and all included terms with their given covariate values.
ProbitD–A levelVery high priorityFor Black applicants, a PIRAT decrease from 0.35 to 0.30 implies a Probit discrete change of about -4.40 pp, while for White applicants it implies about -2.14 pp — different magnitudes, unlike the LPM's identical -2.80 pp for both groups (with no interaction term). Why does Probit produce different magnitudes for the two groups even without an explicit PIRAT×BLACK interaction?
→ A) Because Probit is nonlinear: the marginal/discrete effect of PIRAT depends on the predicted probability level itself, which differs by BLACK status even without an explicit interaction term
Computer Lab 6 — Exercise 4, Probit vs LPM nonlinearity
- A) Because Probit is nonlinear: the marginal/discrete effect of PIRAT depends on the predicted probability level itself, which differs by BLACK status even without an explicit interaction term
- B) Because the Probit model actually includes an interaction term between PIRAT and BLACK
- C) Because Probit coefficients differ by group automatically
- D) This is a calculation error; Probit should give identical effects just like LPM
Even without an interaction term, Probit's nonlinear Φ(·) link function makes the implied probability effect of any regressor depend on the overall linear index (and thus on BLACK, which shifts the index), unlike LPM where effects are mechanically constant across groups.
Rule: Nonlinear models (Probit/Logit) naturally produce covariate-dependent marginal effects even without explicit interaction terms, unlike the linear LPM.
LogitD–A levelVery high priorityUsing Model 2 Logit: P(DENY=1)=Λ[-4.1256+5.3704·PIRAT+1.2728·BLACK], for a Black applicant at PIRAT=0.35, the index is z=-0.9805. Using Λ(z)=1/(1+e^-z), what is the predicted denial probability (compare to the table value ≈27.28%)?
→ A) ≈27.28%
Computer Lab 6 — Exercise 4, Logit calc
- A) ≈27.28%
- B) ≈72.72%
- C) ≈49.51%
- D) ≈9.05%
Λ(-0.9805) = 1/(1+e^0.9805) = 1/(1+2.6654) ≈ 1/3.6654 ≈ 0.2728 = 27.28%, matching the lab's reported value.
Rule: Logit predicted probability: Λ(z) = 1/(1+e^(-z)), computed directly from the linear index z.
Returns & CompoundingE-levelVery high priorityAn index goes from 100 to 160 over 10 years. You want the average annual growth. Which formula?
→ B) (1.6)^(1/10) − 1
Formula Battle — method recognition (built from the Formula Book)
- A) (160 − 100)/100/10
- B) (1.6)^(1/10) − 1
- C) 1.6 / 10
- D) ln(1.6) × 10
Multi-period growth compounds. Correct method: (1.6)^(1/10) − 1.
Rule: CAGR = (End/Start)^(1/n) − 1